Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Ethics Subsequent Employment topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee discusses narrow exception to code of ethics for medical director hire; staff to rework language with ethics board input

3229065 · April 16, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Members debated a request to carve out a narrow exception to Section 32‑11 (subsequent employment) to allow a retired board member to serve as health department medical director. Committee agreed to revise language with input from ethics board members before scheduling public hearing.

The Ordinance Committee reviewed a proposed change to Section 32‑11 of the city Code of Ethics on April 15 that would create an extremely limited exception to restrictions on subsequent employment for a single position: the health department medical director.

Committee staff said the health department has had difficulty retaining a qualified medical director and requested a narrowly tailored exception to permit a retired board member with the needed qualifications to serve. Staff said the draft language would exempt only the medical‑director position and no other positions.

Several committee members raised concerns about precedent and due process. Councilmember Nora Nadelski Eitner said carving out an individual job from a broad ethics rule “sticks in your craw” and recommended additional safeguards; another member suggested requiring an advisory opinion from the Board of Ethics confirming no conflict in the particular case. Committee members asked whether a narrower approach — for example, approving an exception only after a formal advisory opinion from the Board of Ethics — would reduce concerns about future carve‑outs.

Committee members agreed not to send the item immediately to public hearing. Instead staff will work with Councilmember Nadelski Eitner and any interested ethics board members to draft revised language (for example, adding a required advisory opinion or other guardrails) and circulate the revised text before the next meeting. The item will return for further committee review and possible public hearing once the language is finalized.