Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Municipal Risk Insurance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council reviews specialty timber-fire insurance and insurer exclusions; staff to return with definitions

3228548 · May 7, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

City staff and a broker reviewed a specialty timber-fire insurance quote that would cover municipal timber holdings. Council members questioned exclusions (drought, subterranean fire, arson), salvage/adjustment procedures, and a $200,000 firefighting deductible; staff will email definitions and confirm coverages before any purchase decision.

City officials reviewed a specialty timber-fire insurance proposal that would cover municipal timber assets and discussed exclusions, salvage valuation and costs.

The proposed 12‑month premium quoted to the city was $100,739.70, placed through a specialty Lloyds market broker because standard carriers rarely underwrite this coverage. The broker described typical policy features and exclusions — including drought, subterranean fire and pollution — and said losses would be adjusted by satellite assessment with tiered partial payouts rather than a single total-loss payment.

Council members pressed staff to confirm precise definitions and policy language before deciding whether to bind coverage. A staff speaker said they will follow up by email “first thing tomorrow morning” with the requested definitions and to confirm whether arson, drought-caused losses or underground-root fires would be covered or excluded. The broker also confirmed the policy’s firefighting expense deductible would be $200,000.

Why it matters: the city has timber holdings with potential wildfire exposure. Specialty coverage is available but often contains unusual exclusions and large deductibles; the council asked for precise policy language and definitions to evaluate whether the proposed product meets the city’s needs and risk tolerance.

Next steps: staff will provide the written definitions and a follow-up note to council clarifying exclusions (drought, subterranean/subsoil fire, arson), salvage and adjustment procedures and whether closure of recreation uses is required by the carrier. No binding purchase was recorded during the work session.