Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Property Replat topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commissioners discuss replat and fees for small tract; final action unclear in record

3228545 · May 7, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Meeting discussion described a replat/abstract for a 1.33-acre parcel and referenced recording fees; the transcript does not clearly record a final vote on the item.

Freestone County commissioners discussed a replat and abstract for a small tract described as 1.33 acres, and staff explained the recording fees, but the meeting transcript does not show a clearly recorded final vote on the item.

During the item, staff summarized the parcel sizes and fees, saying the tract is "1.33" acres and that when the required fees are paid ("a hundred and $5 per reflux and $10 for additional baby" in the transcript), "it's good to go." Speaker 3 and Speaker 1 exchanged procedural remarks about sending documents to the clerk's office for stamping.

The record shows a motion was made and seconded to approve the replat, and some procedural steps were discussed (sending it to the clerk for checking and stamping). The transcript does not include a clear "Aye/No" roll call or an explicit announcement that the motion passed for this item.

Why it matters: approvals of replats and abstracts authorize land-record changes and are prerequisites for recording deeds and property transactions. The discussion included specific tract acreage and reference to recording fees; however, staff or the clerk should be consulted for the official recorded outcome.

The commissioners moved to other business after the clerk-stamping discussion; the county clerk's recorded minutes should be checked for the formal disposition of this replat item.