Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Fare Free Ridership topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

NRTA reports 73% ridership jump since fare-free launch; on-demand pilot to run for off-season trips

3228382 · May 8, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

NRTA says ridership rose 73% since going fare-free, from 190,000 to 328,000 year-to-date, and is launching an on‑demand pilot using electric vans with a nominal $4 fare outside the statewide fare-free program.

Gary Roberts, administrator of the Nantucket Regional Transit Authority, told the advisory board that since the NRTA went fare-free in April 2024 ridership has increased about 73 percent, rising from roughly 190,000 passengers in the previous fiscal year to about 328,000 year-to-date; the authority projects at least 420,000 riders by fiscal year-end.

Roberts said the fare-free policy is funded through Dec. 31 of the current year and that continued funding is under consideration at the state level. He said the governor's budget proposed $30 million statewide for RTAs while the Senate showed a larger figure; allocations to individual RTAs remain subject to the state budget process.

On demand: Roberts said the authority received a community transit grant to pilot an on-demand, zone-based service for low-demand winter areas using five Ford E‑Transit vans and a software platform. He described the service as online-booked, zone-limited and open to all riders; the pilot is intended to serve areas where running fixed-route buses in winter is inefficient.

Fare policy and cost: Roberts clarified that statewide fare-free funding covers fixed-route services but not the on-demand pilot. He said the pilot will charge a nominal fee, projecting about $4 per ride. During questions, a board member asked whether the on-demand service undercuts local taxi drivers; Roberts replied the service is a taxpayer-funded public transportation benefit funded by grants and that it is less expensive than taxis.

Ending: Roberts and board members framed the pilot as a way to provide mobility in low-demand periods while preserving fixed-route coverage during peak months; the board did not take a separate vote on the on-demand pilot at the meeting.