Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Military Training IGA Deferral topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council defers two intergovernmental license agreements for military training at County Hospital Road after procedural challenge
Summary
Two resolutions authorizing the U.S. military to use property at 1414 County Hospital Road for limited training were deferred following a procedural appeal and a ruling that the items affect a single council district; the district council member requested a one‑meeting deferral.
NASHVILLE — The Metropolitan Council deferred two intergovernmental license agreements on May 6 that would have allowed the United States to use property at 1414 County Hospital Road for limited military training.
The items drew attention not for their substance but for council procedure. Councilmember Kimbrough, whose district includes the property, asked under council rule 9.2 that the measures be deferred one meeting because the subject matter was located within her district and she had not introduced or cosponsored the items. Special Counsel Darby read the rule aloud: “Any resolution or proposed ordinance on first reading, the subject matter of which affects only 1 district, shall upon request be deferred 1 meeting if the member from the district concerned … has not introduced or cosponsored the legislation.”
Councilman Rutherford moved to appeal the chair’s ruling. After debate on whether the measure affected only one district — several members argued the training would involve aircraft and activity crossing multiple districts — the council voted to sustain the vice mayor’s ruling to defer. The vice mayor recorded that the chair’s ruling was sustained and the resolutions were deferred to the council’s second meeting in May.
Chair Gamble’s planning committee and other reporting committees had split or mixed recommendations in their committee hearings: one committee failed to reach a recommendation, while planning recommended approval by a recorded vote. Councilmembers who supported the deferral said the district councilmember should have time to notify constituents and review community concerns; Councilmember Kimbrough said residents had reported being alarmed at previous unannounced exercises and asked that Metro send advance notice to the neighborhood.
Sponsors Hill and Gamble said in committee reports the intergovernmental agreements were for limited access to the parcel for training exercises, but they did not seek final action at the May 6 meeting after the procedural challenge. The items will return at the second meeting in May for further consideration, and council members asked agencies and the sponsor to provide additional community notice and details about the planned exercises in advance of that meeting.
