Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Sidewalks Walkability topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Titusville P&Z backs stricter sidewalk waiver rules, removes in-lieu trust fund
Summary
The Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously recommended an amendment to the city’s sidewalk-waiver rules that removes the "not practical" exception and the sidewalk trust fund, narrows administrative waiver criteria and directs variance requests to the Board of Adjustment and Appeals.
The Titusville Planning and Zoning Commission on May 7 recommended approval of a code amendment that tightens criteria for sidewalk waivers, removes the option to pay into a sidewalk trust fund in lieu of constructing sidewalks, and sets specific thresholds for administrative waivers.
Under the proposed change staff presented, the “not practical” waiver language would be eliminated. A waiver could still be granted administratively only in narrowly defined situations; otherwise an applicant who seeks not to construct a sidewalk would need to pursue a variance from the Board of Adjustment and Appeals. The draft adds an objective distance standard for local streets: a lot or parcel may qualify for a waiver if more than 75% of lots on that local street are within 400 feet of the subject parcel.
Staff said the change is intended to reduce subjective and inconsistent waiver decisions and to encourage construction of sidewalks at the time of development, because retrofitting sidewalks later is typically more expensive. The packet notes that the existing policy—allowing payment into a sidewalk trust fund—can unintentionally increase future costs and make infill construction more difficult.
Member Grama, who led much of the verbal discussion, raised concerns about transparency and long-term connectivity. He urged creation of periodic reporting so City Council can track how often waivers or variances are granted and where gaps appear. “I think somehow there ought to be annual reporting on exceptions and variances for this particularly needed improvement, sidewalk connectivity,” Grama said. He argued reporting would help elected officials target areas for infill sidewalk construction instead of relying solely on discretionary administrative decisions.
Commissioners also asked how the code change would affect cases where a road widening is planned within five years. Staff said the draft removes a prior five-year exception because that criterion proved difficult to interpret and enforce; the administrator would still have the authority to waive the sidewalk in narrow circumstances, and applicants could seek a variance to address unique situations. Staff noted that where a sidewalk ties to an existing section, developers would normally connect to the existing piece and adjustments for a future widening could require later reconstruction.
The proposed amendment strikes the city’s sidewalk trust-fund language from Section 30-2-38 and instead allows remaining trust funds to be used for infill or repairs. Vice Mayor/Member Grama moved approval of the amendment and Member Faison seconded; the commission approved the staff-recommended changes unanimously on a roll-call vote.
The amendment will be forwarded to City Council for consideration.
