Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Library Materials Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Parents and community members press APS to review explicit materials in school libraries

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Multiple public speakers told the board they had found sexually explicit or violent materials in APS libraries and urged the district to create a formal content-review policy and remove or restrict access to books they described as inappropriate for students.

Dozens of public forum commenters urged the Albuquerque Public Schools Board of Education to review and restrict materials that speakers described as pornographic or otherwise inappropriate for children in school libraries and curricula.

Several speakers named specific titles and cited research they said links exposure to explicit content with harm. Damara Andrade said parents had raised concerns about "explicit materials within the APS libraries" and urged the board to raise library standards. Arturo Quintana read passages from a book he said should not be available in schools. Casey Peterson and Mikaela Peterson cited studies and medical journals during public comment and asked the board to adopt a content-review policy and remove harmful materials.

Speakers suggested practical steps including content review policies, age-appropriate restrictions, and clearer communication with parents. Some named titles specifically: speakers referenced Lucky by Alice Sebold and Choke by Chuck Palahniuk when describing material they considered sexually explicit or violent (spelling corrected to the widely accepted published titles). Speakers did not identify a specific board or administration action taken at the meeting; the comments were part of the public forum and were referred to the administration for response.

The board acknowledged the testimony during the president's report and said the administration would consider the concerns raised. No formal policy or book-removal vote occurred at the May 7 meeting.