Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Front Yard Fences topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Stow City workshop debates permitting tall front‑yard 'garden' fences, recommends larger setbacks

3226077 · May 8, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Planning staff and participants discussed a draft zoning change that would allow garden fencing in front yards up to 8 feet tall with recommended 20‑foot setbacks, while raising concerns about appearance, wildlife, safety and enforcement.

At a Stow City planning workshop, staff presented draft zoning language that would explicitly allow “garden fences” in front yards and elsewhere on private property, and participants debated height, setback and screening standards.

The change under review would permit wire‑mesh, wood, or plastic mesh garden fencing up to 8 feet tall around gardens in front yards. A staff presenter said the draft includes a setback provision; participants repeatedly recommended a 20‑foot setback from the public right‑of‑way.

Why it matters: allowing tall fences in front yards could affect neighborhood appearance, sight lines, pedestrian safety and interactions with homeowners associations. Participants said the rules must avoid creating enforcement headaches while protecting residents from deer and other nuisances.

Staff gave background on the proposal and recent complaints. “So quick background on this,” a staff member said. “Back in the fall, some fence garden fence regulations were proposed ... you could have garden fence ... up to 8 feet in height around the garden, in the front yard or anywhere in the yard. We suggested at least a 10 foot setback, which I think is included in the code now. We recommend and present it 20 feet the right way to be consistent with the other front yard fence setbacks.”

Participants raised multiple concerns. One said an 18‑inch strip would do little to deter deer; another replied, “18 inches is not a — that’s not a fence,” arguing a minimum of 6 feet is needed to prevent deer from jumping over. Several speakers said 8 feet may be acceptable for some properties but urged a larger setback to maintain sight lines and avoid fences falling onto sidewalks or into the right‑of‑way.

Speakers also discussed how the term “garden” should be defined. One participant warned that separating vegetable and flower gardens “will just end up in a mess,” noting many residents use mixed plantings. Others said the code’s new distinction between “front yard” and “street yard” should reduce conflicts on corner lots where two street frontages complicate enforcement.

Workshop participants noted homeowners associations (HOAs) can further restrict fences: an attendee observed some HOAs will not permit the fences regardless of zoning changes. The draft would allow garden fences to remain year‑round; staff said maintenance or fallen fences could become a code violation.

On electrified garden fencing, participants said the draft currently prohibits electrified fences but acknowledged working farms nearby sometimes use them for livestock. Speakers asked staff to check exemptions for bona fide agricultural uses.

What’s next: staff said the code language needs refinement around the definition of garden, setback distances and enforcement. Participants asked staff to return with clarified setback wording and examples that show how the rule would apply to shallow versus deep front yards.

Ending: The planning staff will revise the draft setback and definition language and follow up with materials and examples at a later workshop.