Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Development Code Amendments topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council holds public hearings on two Land Development Code amendments; no public comment
Summary
Hudson City Council held public hearings on May 6 for two proposed Land Development Code amendments—one on Architectural and Historic Board of Review consultant advice (25-28) and one removing townhomes from most zoning districts (25-43). No members of the public spoke on either hearing; both remain in the legislative process.
Get email alerts on the Land Development Code Amendments topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Hudson City Council held two public hearings at its May 6 meeting on proposed amendments to the city's Land Development Code but received no public comments on either item.
Item 25-28 would amend Chapter 1202.04(B)(3) of the Land Development Code related to the Architectural and Historic Board of Review and the advice of consultants. Item 25-43 would amend multiple sections of the Land Development Code (1205.04, 1205.06, 1205.07, 1205.11 and 1206.01) to remove townhomes from all zoning districts except District 5 (Village Core District). The mayor read the public-hearing procedures and invited speakers; no one approached the lectern on either matter.
City staff indicated there were no speakers for the hearings and the council closed the public-hearing portions of the meeting without public testimony. Both ordinances were later listed on the legislative agenda: item 25-28 was set for a second reading and item 25-43 was also set for a second reading during the same meeting.
Why it matters: Both proposed amendments are changes to the city’s Land Development Code that would affect how historic and architectural review is advised and the allowed locations for townhome development. Neither ordinance was acted on during the public-hearing segment; the matter remained in the legislative process for future council consideration.
Next steps: The items remained on the legislative calendar for further readings; no public testimony was recorded on May 6.
