Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Teacher Retention topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Candidates prioritize consistency, administrator quality and respect to retain teachers
Summary
At a forum for Averill Park Central School District board candidates, contenders emphasized long‑range planning, respect for teachers, and the role of administrators in preventing burnout and improving retention.
Get email alerts on the Teacher Retention topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Candidates for the Averill Park Central School District board told voters they would focus on supporting administrators, preserving consistency in district goals and funding professional development to help retain teachers and staff.
Several candidates described retention as a function of stable, clear goals and trusted school leadership rather than short‑term fixes. Incumbent board member Samantha said retention depends on "high but achievable standards, a clear path to achieve those standards" and long‑term planning so teachers can rely on continuity during budget ups and downs.
Chris Phillips, a candidate and current middle school teacher, said selecting the right administrators is critical: "A lot happens from there. I've been in districts where the administration is great, and it helps everything come together." He also cited declining respect for teachers from parents and students as a driver of burnout.
Megan said thanking teachers, supporting district professional development, and avoiding unnecessary interference in classroom decisions help retain staff. "When our admin team outlines a professional development goal and requires our support as a body, [we should] fund that professional development," she said.
Allison Massey said listening to teachers' concerns is essential: "If they have complaints, I want them to know that ... they have an ear on board." Candidates described a range of non‑pay measures (respect, clear processes, professional development) while acknowledging pay and funding are important but largely tied to broader budget constraints.
No candidate proposed a specific binding board action or budget line during the forum; suggestions focused on priorities the next board could adopt and on supporting the district's administrative team.

