Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Union Decertification topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee considers raising threshold to trigger union decertification petitions to 50% plus one
Summary
The committee debated a proposal to change the showing‑of‑interest threshold for union decertification petitions from 30% of the bargaining unit to 50% plus one, and whether to apply that change across multiple labor‑relations statutes. Members voiced competing views about employee choice, fairness and susceptibility to outside "decertification"
The House General & Housing Committee on May 6 heard debate over proposed changes to decertification rules that would raise the showing‑of‑interest threshold required to trigger a decertification election from 30% to 50% plus one.
Sophie, the committee counsel, outlined that the senate’s original language applied the change to the State Employee Labor Relations Act (CELRA/SELRO as described in the markup) and that staff had drafted additional sections to extend a 50%‑plus‑one requirement to other statutes, including the Judicial Employee Labor Relations Act, teachers and administrators act, municipal employees act, independent direct support providers, and the early care and education providers labor relations act. Sophie noted statutory cross‑references that would need adjustment (transcript references to sections identified as 15‑84 and 15‑81).
Committee members divided over the proposal. Proponents said raising the threshold would limit repeated or politically motivated decertification campaigns and align decertification with the 50% card‑check option available for certification in some circumstances. One member characterized the change as “bringing it closer to alignment” so petitions better reflected widespread support before an election.
Opponents said raising the threshold makes it harder for employees dissatisfied with a union to prompt a review, and noted decertification is a different circumstance than initial certification because a union and contract already exist; several members argued for parity (either leaving decertification at 30% or changing certification rules so both sides match). A committee member also raised concerns about small bargaining units: in a unit of four, a 30% threshold requires two signatures and a 50% threshold would require two signatures as well, so the effect varies with unit size.
The committee conducted a nonbinding straw poll on the decertification section; staff recorded members’ positions during the meeting. The straw poll indicated majority support among members present for the 50%‑plus‑one threshold as drafted for the section under consideration. Members also discussed expanding the change to other labor statutes; several members asked staff to prepare revised language that would apply the higher threshold across statutes if the committee directs it.
No formal amendment or final vote was taken; staff were instructed to return with drafting revisions and statutory cross‑references for committee consideration.
