Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Parks And Recreation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Shakopee staff, baseball association outline $60,000-per-field plan for Westminster fields; council asks neighbors-first approach

3214220 · May 7, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Shakopee staff and representatives of the Shakopee Youth Baseball Association presented proposed improvements for Westminster Park ballfields at a May 6 workshop, describing a package of changes aimed at making the fields better suited for youth baseball tournaments and regular play.

Shakopee staff and representatives of the Shakopee Youth Baseball Association presented proposed improvements for Westminster Park ballfields at a May 6 workshop, describing a package of changes aimed at making the fields better suited for youth baseball tournaments and regular play.

Why it matters: the project would convert softball-style fields into youth-baseball-friendly configurations, potentially increasing participation and creating a venue for 9U–11U tournaments; parking, neighborhood impact and funding were central concerns during council discussion.

Proposed changes include moving the outfield fence from roughly 240 feet to 200 feet and lowering fence height from 6 feet to 4 feet; converting the infield to turf/grass with added irrigation and maintenance (staff said irrigation exists but additional heads would be required); installing field armor in batter’s boxes to reduce maintenance; pouring concrete dugout floors; and adding shelving/storage in dugouts. The association’s president attended the meeting and staff said the group is prepared to raise funds and has already gathered about $35,000 toward the project.

Council and staff discussed parking constraints at the Westminster location, noting on-street spaces, nearby park demand and limited lot capacity. Council members asked staff and the association to hold a neighborhood meeting to gather resident feedback, explore shuttle or remote parking options (for large events) and evaluate whether phased construction or public parking additions would be feasible. Staff said a reconfiguration to add parking had been studied but would carry additional cost and neighborhood impact.

Cost estimates in the presentation included a single infield and irrigation quote of about $35,000 per field and an overall rough estimate near $60,000 per field; fencing and dugout work were smaller components. Staff suggested a phased approach — for example, replacing fences and dugout surfaces first and addressing infield grass in a later season — to spread costs over multiple years.

Council did not vote to fund the project at the meeting. Instead the council’s direction was to hold a neighborhood meeting, let staff further vet parking options and return with a more detailed plan if the association wishes to proceed; the association said it does not plan to request city funds at this time and intends to apply for outside grants.

Ending: Staff and the association will stage outreach to neighbors, refine cost and parking analyses, and report back to council before any city-funded work proceeds.