Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Bulk Waste topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Advisory board raises equity and access questions about bulk‑waste pickup and drop‑off
Summary
Board members said current bulk-waste disposal options create access and equity issues for residents without trucks or neighborhood association resources and asked staff to gather county disposal data and cost estimates to inform possible solutions.
Get email alerts on the Bulk Waste topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
At its May 5 meeting, the Oshkosh City Sustainability Advisory Board discussed bulk‑waste disposal—mattresses, large remodeling debris and other items that do not fit in household trash—and whether current arrangements leave some residents without practical or affordable disposal options.
A board member who recently moved to Oshkosh described how other cities once provided a citywide bulk‑pickup service and asked what options exist now. The group noted common existing pathways: paid curbside pickup after city tag purchase, individual trips to the Winnebago/Outagamie county landfill facility, neighborhood association‑sponsored roll‑off events, or paid private haulers. Members said these options can be time consuming or unaffordable for people who lack vehicles or cannot move large items to the curb.
Members identified several data needs: county-level counts of household drop‑offs, costs for one‑time roll‑off events, the number of residents using neighborhood‑association programs, and the city’s historical analysis of a full citywide bulk pickup (Brandon had previously compiled cost data). The board suggested a public survey or targeted outreach at the farmers market to estimate demand and to understand what residents know about current services.
Board members also recommended inviting Winnebago County solid‑waste staff to present annual drop‑off counts and receipts so the board could assess scale and cost. The group discussed funding options such as neighborhood association funds administered through the city (GoHNI was mentioned as an existing channel) and whether a subsidized or free drop‑off period could be feasible.
No formal motion was made. The board agreed to pursue concurrent research on bulk‑waste and composting (both topics overlap on disposal logistics) and to return the item with data on usage, costs and potential community outreach approaches.

