Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Bond Refunding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Coppell staff outline 'parameter sale' option for possible bond refunding; council asks for advisor briefing
Summary
City finance staff briefed council on three callable bond issues and presented a 'parameter sale' approach that would let the city authorize sale parameters in advance and let the financial advisor enter the market if rates become favorable. Council asked staff to arrange a briefing with the city’s financial advisor.
Coppell finance staff updated the City Council on Wednesday about three callable bond issues and described an authorization tool called a “parameter sale” that would let the city lock in limits and allow staff or advisors to execute a refunding if market conditions improve.
Kim, finance staff, said she had been working with the city’s financial advisor, Jason Hughes of Hilltop Securities, to evaluate whether callable series could be refunded at a net present‑value savings. She summarized staff analysis showing that only the Series 2013 certificates of obligation currently show a positive net present‑value savings in today's market; two other series (2014 sales‑tax revenue bonds and 2015 COs) would not produce savings at present interest rates.
Nut graf: Because interest‑rate movements can change daily, staff described a ‘parameter sale’ — allowed by Local Government Code chapter 1371, Kim said — that would specify maximum par amount, maximum interest rate, final maturity date and minimum required savings and allow the advisor to enter the market when conditions met the council‑approved parameters.
Kim explained the parameter sale concept and the legal basis: “A parameter sale is a method of authorizing the sale of bonds where city council approves the transaction in advance, and the approval includes, setting specific limits or parameters on key terms,” and she cited Local Government Code chapter 1371 as authorizing that flexibility.
Councilmembers asked about advisor fees and competitive options. Ramesh asked whether Hilltop would charge a flat fee or a performance fee; Kim said she would confirm the fee structure with Jason Hughes. Councilmember Kevin asked whether refunding would reduce the interest‑and‑sinking (I&S) component of the tax rate; staff confirmed refunding could lower I&S payments and that timing would determine whether the reduction would appear in the FY26 tax calculations.
Several councilmembers said they wanted an in‑depth briefing from Jason Hughes before making any parameter‑sale decision. Finance staff said they would invite the advisor to a council meeting to explain parameters, fee structure and transaction mechanics.
Ending: Staff will schedule a meeting with the city’s financial advisor, provide the council recommended parameter ranges and return with a formal recommendation should council wish to adopt a parameter sale authorization.
