Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Financial Transparency topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Village to pilot ClearGov transparency portal for monthly financial updates; $5,000 annual subscription
Summary
Assistant Administrator/Finance Director Cameron presented a ClearGov transparency portal to publish digestible monthly financial data, demographic context and project summaries; trustees supported a soft launch and a board member volunteered to beta‑test the tool.
Get email alerts on the Financial Transparency topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The village’s assistant administrator and finance director presented a proposal to publish a ClearGov transparency portal on the village website to give residents an easier, monthly view of revenues, expenditures, debt and select capital projects.
The portal would draw five years of data from the village’s financial system, update after month‑end close, and include demographic context. Cameron told trustees the vendor subscription would cost about $5,000 annually and staff estimated roughly two hours of monthly staff time to prepare and publish each update. The portal’s default view would focus on the general fund but could toggle to other funds and project pages as needed.
Why it matters: Trustees said a more accessible, interactive presentation of village finances could help residents understand budget choices and improve transparency ahead of the 2026 budget season. Trustee Paula volunteered to beta‑test the portal on behalf of the board.
Details: The demonstration showed summary charts (for example, the portal displays a breakdown of general fund revenues with taxes shown as 68.2 percent in the sample data) and deeper drill‑downs into expenditure categories, debt composition, and capital project timelines. Staff noted the portal can be linked to project pages, provide subscription alerts for updates, and support limited comment or question features. The portal can be configured to archive public comments if needed to meet open‑records considerations.
Action taken: Trustees gave staff direction to proceed with a soft launch and to coordinate communications; no appropriation beyond the subscription was approved at the meeting. Staff said the water and sewer utilities would pick up a share of the subscription cost and that a broader ClearGov budgeting module could be considered later but was not recommended at this time because of cost versus benefit.
Next steps: Staff will pilot the portal, prepare introductory materials and soft‑launch access for board beta testing; communications staff will plan outreach and a potential mailer tied to budget outreach.

