Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Coastal Resiliency Silt topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Local volunteer group urges county focus on coastal sediment, longshore drift and infrastructure resiliency
Summary
A volunteer group, the Pasco Coastal Improvement Council, briefed commissioners on 60 years of local coastal research and urged county attention to silt shifts, impaired water basins and regional dredging strategies to protect infrastructure and reduce flood and insurance impacts.
Get email alerts on the Coastal Resiliency Silt topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
At the April 30 meeting, Doctor Kirk Phillips, representing the Pasco Coastal Improvement Council, gave a public-comment briefing urging Pasco County to address coastal siltation and longshore drift disruptions that, he said, are degrading channels, exacerbating flooding and raising insurance and infrastructure costs.
Phillips told the board the council’s review of the county’s eight coastal basins found impairment from silt and chemicals; he said no Section 404 dredge/permit applications to the U.S. Army Corps or EPA have been pursued to address longer-term conveyance and longshore drift correction. He urged a federal–state–county approach for projects that would return sediment to natural sinks such as Anclote Island and restore natural longshore processes from Crystal River to Tarpon Springs.
Phillips said the group has worked with geospatial agencies and modeling to validate sediment shifts over 17 years and offered the county pro bono technical advice and modeling support. He asked the board to consider a coordinated regional strategy that includes dredging, harbor maintenance and longshore-drift correction to reduce the need for repeated rebuilds and lessen impacts on roads and insurance costs.
Commissioners and staff noted that some coastal maintenance requires federal and state permits and funding; they asked staff to follow up with the group and federal agencies where appropriate. Phillips’ comments were accepted as public input; no board action was taken at the meeting.

