Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Appointments And Boards topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee defers Community Development Authority appointment pending chair recommendation; vote 2–1
Summary
The Judiciary, Personnel and Licensing Committee deferred a nomination to the Community Development Authority (CDA) and voted 2–1 to send the appointment back for a recommendation from the CDA chair before forwarding to the full board.
Get email alerts on the Appointments And Boards topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Shorewood Judiciary, Personnel and Licensing Committee voted to defer a nomination to the Community Development Authority and seek a recommendation from the CDA chair before sending an appointment to the village board.
The committee took the action after members said they wanted guidance on the skill set needed for the CDA prior to making an appointment; one member said they planned to abstain if the committee voted without a formal recommendation from the CDA chair.
Motion and vote: A committee member moved to defer the CDA appointment pending input from the CDA chair and another member seconded the motion. The committee chair called for a vote; members voiced “aye” and “nay” and the chair stated, “Motion carries 2 to 1.”
Why it matters: Committee members noted the CDA will consider North Oakland Avenue development materials later in May and said timing of the CDA’s upcoming docket made a recommendation from the CDA chair useful before the committee forwards a nominee to the full board.
Discussion and context: That discussion included three viewpoints: one member favored appointing a nominee with prior plan‑commission experience to broaden participation; another favored a nominee with finance experience; and a third asked the CDA chair to identify the specific skills needed on the authority before the committee acts. The committee chose to defer so the CDA chair could provide that guidance.
Next steps: The committee’s motion to defer was carried and the matter will be returned once the CDA chair supplies input; committee members noted an upcoming board meeting timeframe in which the appointment could still be forwarded if the recommendation is available.
Ending: With the vote concluded, the committee adjourned and the clerk’s administrative support was thanked for processing volunteer applications.

