Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

DRB closes hearing on Rice Memorial High School athletic expansion after stormwater questions resolved

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The South Burlington Development Review Board closed the public hearing on an amendment to Rice Memorial High School’s previously approved 126,875-square-foot educational facility after city staff and DPW cleared outstanding stormwater comments; closing the hearing was not a final approval of the project.

South Burlington, Vt. — The South Burlington Development Review Board closed the public hearing on May 6 for an amendment to Rice Memorial High School’s previously approved 126,875-square-foot educational facility after city staff and the Department of Public Works resolved remaining stormwater questions.

The amendment, filed by the Roman Catholic Diocese of Burlington, would add four tennis courts, a storage shed for equipment, a combination of pervious and impervious walkways, 18-foot-tall bleachers and a 25-foot-tall accessory structure to house concessions, bathrooms and a press box at 99 Procter Avenue. The application is listed as site plan SB2506 and conditional use CU2501.

Staff told the board that the applicant had satisfied all outstanding staff comments except two stormwater items; those final stormwater comments were resolved after the applicant coordinated with city staff and DPW. “We have the thumbs up from DPW on the provided stormwater plans, so that is no longer an issue,” Marty Gilles, South Burlington planning and zoning, told the board.

Board Chair Dawn Filibert asked whether any members had further questions. With none, the board voted to close the hearing; John Muscatelli moved to close and Jody Lesko seconded. The motion carried and the board closed the public hearing on the amendment. The transcript and staff remarks record only the closing of the hearing; no final land-use decision or permit approval is recorded in the meeting transcript.

The board and staff did not list any additional conditions or final findings on the record at the meeting. Developers or interested parties seeking the current record on decision status should consult planning staff or subsequent meeting minutes for any final action on SB2506/CU2501.

Speakers quoted in this article spoke during the Rice Memorial hearing in the May 6 session, as recorded in the meeting transcript.