Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Water Quality topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Ditch board accepts petition, schedules public hearing for iron-enhanced filter on County Ditch 13

3212493 · May 7, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Scott County Ditch Board on May 6 accepted a petition and set a June 3 public hearing for a watershed proposal to install an iron-enhanced sand filter to remove phosphorus from water leaving Swamp Lake into County Ditch 13.

The Scott County Ditch Board on May 6 accepted a petition from the Spring Lake–Prior Lake Watershed District and set a public hearing for June 3 on a proposed iron-enhanced sand filter to reduce phosphorus in water flowing from Swamp Lake into County Ditch 13.

A county staff presenter identified as Chris described the plan: the watershed district proposes to build a berm near Swamp Lake to divert some ditch flow into a sand filter (an iron-enhanced treatment cell) that would remove phosphorus before returning treated water to County Ditch 13. The filter will sit on private property where the watershed district has obtained a construction easement and a long-term maintenance easement.

Funding: The watershed district received a Clean Water Fund grant to cover project costs; any expenses beyond the grant amount will be covered by the watershed district.

Board action: The ditch board accepted the petition and appointed engineer Kyle Crawford of Emmons & Olivier Resources to prepare the required report for the project and to present findings at the scheduled public hearing. The board formally adopted resolution number 2020Five-one32 accepting the petition and later adopted resolution 2025-133 (as listed in the ditch packet language) to set a public hearing for June 3 at 8:00 a.m. in the county boardroom.

Discussion vs. decision: Acceptance of the petition and setting the hearing are procedural steps; no final project authorization or assessment decision was made pending the engineer’s report and the June 3 hearing.

Next steps: The appointed engineer will prepare a report of findings, notice will be sent to affected landowners along Branch 2A, and the board will hold the public hearing on June 3 to receive evidence and public comment before making a final determination.