Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Open Meetings topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Caucus debate over 3‑member advisory committee open‑meeting exemption; some members say Senate change undermines original intent
Summary
HB 2231’s Senate amendment limits who may serve on a three‑member advisory committee by barring more than one member from being part of any public body. Members warned the change could undo the bill’s intent to ease subcommittee work without triggering open‑meeting posting requirements.
House Bill 2,231 was presented to the caucus as a bill that would exempt certain three‑member advisory committees or subcommittees from public meeting law for exchanges among a quorum that involve discussion or deliberation. The Senate amendment specifies that a three‑member advisory committee or subcommittee may not include more than one member who is a member of any public body.
Representative Stahl Hamilton and other members questioned how the amendment would function in practice, warning that the change could negate the original intent of easing committee work for subcommittees formed by governing bodies. Stahl Hamilton said the amendment “totally undo[s] the original intent of the bill” and indicated she planned to vote no on the bill unless the matter was revisited. Staff explained the term “public body” broadly and acknowledged uncertainty about some implementation scenarios, and members requested follow-up on how existing boards would be affected.
No formal caucus vote was recorded; discussion focused on whether the Senate amendment made the bill impractical for ordinary governing boards that use subcommittees.
