Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Vermont state archivist warns sealing, expungement law will strain legacy records and technology

3212416 · May 8, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

State Archivist Tanya Marshall told a legislative committee that sealing and expungement under S.112/H.112 intersects with decades of legacy records, uneven record schedules and limited technology; she urged clearer procedures, earlier systems review and a single point-of-entry for public record checks.

Tanya Marshall, the state archivist and chief records officer for the Vermont State Archives and Records Administration (a division of the Secretary of State’s Office), told the Legislature on May 7 that sealing and expungement work under S.112 will require substantial records-management work across agencies.

Marshall said the archives can offer management guidance and functional analyses but cautioned that many records remain in legacy formats and that some technology systems lack the retention and access controls needed to implement sealing and expungement reliably.

Marshall described the archives’ role and the law that created it: “I’m Tanya Marshall. I’m the chief records officer and the state archivist and the director of the Vermont State Archives and Records Administration. We’re a division of the Secretary of State’s Office.” She said the office’s statutory program—created in Act 1 of 2003—establishes statewide records and information management and maintains record schedules that control retention, disposition and security coding.

Why it matters: Marshall told the committee that sealing (making a record inaccessible to public search) and expungement (destruction of records) are technically possible in many cases but often impractical without changes to agency processes, clearer legal definitions and better technology. She emphasized that some records are held as paper, on microfilm or as audio recordings that cannot be surgically redacted or removed without destroying larger, historically significant materials.

Most…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans