Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Executive Session topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board votes to enter executive session citing character, professional competence and possible imminent litigation
Summary
The board approved a motion to move into executive session to discuss "character, professional competence" and a "reasonably imminent litigation," then paused the meeting to set up the closed session.
An unnamed board voted to enter an executive session to discuss "the character, professional competence, and pending a reasonably imminent litigation," the chair said, and the voice vote passed.
The chair (name not given in the transcript) introduced the motion, saying, "I am seeking a motion that the board go into executive session for the purpose of discussing the character, professional competence, and pending a reasonably imminent litigation." A participant said, "So moved." The official calling the roll recorded "yes" votes for Member Boggess, Member Hart, Vice Chair Wood and Member Kelly; Member Davis was recorded as absent and Member Riel "could not join." The chair closed the vote by saying, "I don't hear her vote, but that passes."
The motion cited personnel-related matters (character and professional competence) and a pending, reasonably imminent legal matter as the grounds for the closed session. The transcript contains no further substantive discussion about the topics to be discussed in executive session; the board paused the open meeting so members could "stretch, use the restroom," and to let staff "set up" for the closed session.
Because the transcript does not identify the board by name or provide any details revealed during the executive session, no additional information about the personnel matter or litigation is available in the record.
