Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Middle Housing Code Package topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council committee advances middle-housing package — code changes, unit-lot subdivisions and RM rezone — to first reading

3208423 · May 6, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The committee forwarded combined amendments to Federal Way Revised Code Title 18 (subdivisions) and Title 19 (zoning), unit-lot subdivision rules and a legislative rezone that consolidates three multifamily zones into one RM zone. Staff cited House Bill 1110 and Senate Bill 5258; the council moved the package to first reading on May 20.

City planners presented a package of code and map changes to implement the state's middle-housing directives and to add unit-lot subdivision procedures. Holly Bosack and Stacy Welsh said the amendments respond to state legislation and local policy choices to allow a range of middle-housing types — duplex, triplex, fourplex, townhouses, courtyard apartments and cottage housing — on lots in single-family and suburban estate zones.

Why it matters: House Bill 1110 requires jurisdictions to allow 4–6 unit middle-housing types in qualifying areas; staff said the amendments align local regulations with the statute's requirements. The city also proposed unit-lot subdivisions (required by 2023's Senate Bill 5258) so that individual housing units can be sold as separate lots while a parent lot remains in common ownership for access and common tracts.

Key points from the presentation: - Maximum units per lot: staff recommended a uniform maximum of six units on a lot in the designated residential zones. That can include combinations of a single-family home plus up to five middle-housing units, or six middle-housing units, and may include up to two attached ADUs per lot in some combinations. "It is a total of 6," council staff said when clarifying unit counts for the subdivision process. - Parking: required off-street parking would range from 0 to 2 spaces per unit, with the zero-parking option tied to proximity to rapid transit (staff noted a half-mile walking shed standard). - Setbacks and standards: middle-housing typologies will generally have a five-foot setback from property lines; middle housing will be exempt from existing design guidelines per the proposed code text. - Unit-lot subdivisions: planners said a parent lot must meet zone dimensional standards while individual unit lots may not; the unit-lot tool is an alternative to condominiums and is intended to simplify ownership for certain middle-housing projects.

Timeline and procedure: staff noted the state set deadlines for local adoption: jurisdictions must adopt local rules before a state model code applies on July 1 (staff said the city has until June to adopt its own amendments). The committee voted to forward the Title 18, Title 19, unit-lot subdivision and comprehensive-plan/rezone items to first reading on the May 20, 2025 council agenda.

Council discussion touched on practical limits: council members asked what portion of the city could practically take advantage of the new allowances (sewer availability, septic and well constraints), and staff estimated a rough applicability of 20–30 percent of parcels given septic, sewer access and covenants. Staff recommended outreach with builders and noted that petitioner fees and staff capacity drive permitting timelines.

Actions: Committee motions forwarded each ordinance to first reading on May 20, 2025. The planning commission had recommended approval; the mayor recommended adoption as drafted.

Ending: The committee advanced the package to the full council; staff said they will continue technical refinements and prepare for the May 20 first readings and additional public hearing steps as required.