Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Service Delivery Accountability topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Resident alleges multiple service failures, urges county accountability

3208154 · May 7, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A Sawyer County resident placed several accusations about local service delivery, including missed welfare checks, food-shelf disputes and perceived misconduct by county staff and law enforcement; the comments were voiced during public comment and no formal county finding was reported at the meeting.

Tamara Jorgensen Shamansky addressed the Sawyer County Human Services Committee during the public-comment period and described multiple personal experiences she said showed a lack of competence and accountability among county staff and service providers.

Shamansky, who identified her address as Mosquito Brook Road, described a string of incidents including missed welfare checks after rehab, difficulties obtaining grant paperwork, disputes at a local food shelf and what she described as a sheriff’s office statement that she had been slandered. She alleged that human-services staff did not show up when she returned from rehabilitation and that she “laid out there on cold freezing ground for 6 days” before reaching help.

She also complained that a driver refused to provide senior-bus service because the driver “didn't even know the area the grant covered,” and said a county employee told her she received “too much food” from a food shelf. Shamansky characterized one worker’s conduct as an attempt to have her involuntarily committed and said state-mandated court practices were not followed by the district attorney’s office in at least one case.

All statements were made by Shamansky during public comment; no county official provided a response or announced an investigation during the meeting.

The committee acknowledged the comment with thanks and moved on to agenda business. The speaker did not request a formal action on the record at that time; no motion or referral was made in the meeting minutes discussed on the record.

Because these are allegations made during public comment, the committee’s published minutes — or a follow-up staff report — would be the appropriate sources to determine whether the county opened inquiries or took corrective steps.