Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Housing Short Term Rentals topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council discusses changes to short-term rental rules, including occupancy limits and required contact information

3205886 · May 6, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council reviewed proposed amendments to the city’s short-term rental code (section references in the transcript), debated maximum occupant calculations, and confirmed they would not vote on the ordinance that night.

The Two Rivers City Council discussed proposed amendments to the city’s short-term rental regulations that would add licensing, a maximum-occupancy formula and required contact information for emergency response.

Andrew, the city attorney, reviewed draft language that would add a current license requirement, clarify maximum capacity calculations and require contact information for the police, fire department, property owner and property manager to be available to the city. The ordinance language under discussion would also allow the city additional enforcement discretion in private-property cases rather than automatically requiring city intervention in every instance.

Council members debated how to define the maximum occupant count. One councilmember questioned a draft provision that appeared to allow “two persons for every bedroom plus four additional persons,” asking whether the intent was to permit extra occupants for living rooms or pull-out couches. Council members said they wanted to allow reasonable uses such as hotel-style pull-out couches and children on floors, but several expressed concerns about how many extra occupants to permit. After discussion, one councilmember said they preferred zero additional persons but was willing to compromise on two.

Andrew confirmed the council would not vote on the ordinance that night; the item was being placed into the code as part of ongoing edits and would return for formal action at a future meeting.