Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Subdivision Farmingdale topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Blacksburg planning panel approves Farmingdale subdivision, grants two variances on road and trail requirements
Summary
The Blacksburg Planning Commission recommended approval of Plat 2416 (Farmingdale), a 20‑lot preliminary major subdivision at 210 Farmingdale Lane, and approved two variances: one delaying dedication of Farmingdale Lane beyond the existing pavement and one exempting construction of much of a proposed multiuse trail along U.S. 460.
The Blacksburg Planning Commission on Tuesday recommended approval of Plat 2416 (Farmingdale), a preliminary major subdivision for about 20 residential lots at 210 Farmingdale Lane, and approved two related variance requests covering road dedication and trail construction.
Staff told the commission the overall parcel covers approximately 108 acres with a roughly 6‑acre development area to create 20 lots; about 73 acres would remain as open space. Staff said the applicant would dedicate about 1.2 acres of right of way to the town but requested a variance (section 5‑303) to defer any additional dedication of Farmingdale Lane beyond the existing edge of pavement and a separate variance (section 5‑500) to avoid constructing several thousand linear feet of a multiuse trail within an existing easement along the U.S. 460 Bypass.
The commission’s action followed public comments from adjacent property owners raising access, erosion and stormwater concerns. Annette Bach, professor emerita and owner of parcel 209 Farmingdale Lane, asked the commission to “please address the issues of both road and fencing” and pressed for protections against erosion and for a lasting obligation for stormwater‑pond maintenance. In response, planning staff said town engineering would review stormwater plans and that “we would ensure that all the state code requirements were met with any development of [the] stormwater management pond.”
Staff presentation described three new remainder lots (labeled new lot A and B with no single‑family dwelling and new lot C with one dwelling) and explained limits to future connectivity: the nearest public street is about a mile away, maximum block/straight street length rules (900 feet) constrain additional subdivision off the lane, and existing open‑space commitments restrict development. Staff also cited safety and traffic concerns at the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT)‑maintained intersection with the U.S. 460 Bypass as a reason to be cautious about dedicating and improving Farmingdale Lane beyond the subdivision.
On the trail variance, staff noted roughly 800 linear feet of trail is proposed and that the applicant requested relief from constructing the additional roughly 4,000–4,500 linear feet that lie within an existing easement. Staff and the applicant discussed the maintenance burden the town would assume if right of way were dedicated over a privately maintained gravel drive.
Commissioners voted to approve the variance under section 5‑303 (to defer additional dedication of Farmingdale Lane), approved the variance under section 5‑500 (to limit trail construction beyond the proposed 800 linear feet), and then voted to recommend approval of the Plat 2416 Farmingdale preliminary major subdivision. There was no recorded opposition during the roll call votes.
The commission’s staff said a maintenance agreement for the stormwater pond would be required and that the town’s engineering department would review construction and runoff controls. Public commenters emphasized that the homeowners’ association responsibilities for the pond and potential transfer of long‑term maintenance costs should be clarified; one resident asked the commission to “please establish a forever clause for HOA maintenance.”
The commission’s approvals complete the planning commission’s recommendation step; further approvals and any required permits (including VDOT actions for the intersection and any state stormwater approvals) will be needed before construction begins.
Less substantive agenda items handled at the same meeting included consent items to schedule public hearings on two rezoning requests and approval of April 1, 2025, minutes.
Questions raised during the meeting that remain to be resolved include the final language and enforcement mechanism of the stormwater maintenance agreement, the town’s long‑term maintenance liabilities if right of way is accepted over private drives, and any VDOT requirements for intersection improvements at U.S. 460.
