Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Solid Waste Recycling Contract topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Carroll County approves SLM Recycling hauling contract for convenience centers with revisions requested
Summary
The Carroll County Board of Commissioners approved a hauling agreement with SLM Recycling to remove scrap metal, aluminum cans and cardboard from county convenience centers, while commissioners asked staff to tighten renewal, invoicing and insurance language before final execution.
The Carroll County Board of Commissioners approved a contract with SLM Recycling to haul scrap metal, aluminum cans and cardboard from the county's convenience centers, with commissioners asking staff to add clarifying language on renewals, invoicing, insurance and holiday scheduling before finalization.
Danny Yates, Carroll County public works director, told the commission the agreement “is gonna save us a significant amount of money by the end of the year” and asked the board to approve the contract so the firm could begin hauling materials.
During discussion, a commissioner raised detailed contract concerns and requested changes to several sections. Commissioners asked that: price and renewal language be clarified (the monetary price in the draft is locked for the first three years but not thereafter); the contract require the vendor to name the authorized county contact who may request unscheduled pickups; invoicing terms be extended from the effective net-10 turnaround in the draft to allow county staff more time to review invoices; the county be named as an additional insured on vendor insurance certificates; and the vendor supply an annual holiday/operations calendar so 48-hour turnaround commitments account for vendor closures.
County counsel Stacy Blackman said staff could add the clarifying language the commissioners requested and confirmed staff would make those edits. After that assurance, the board voted 7-0 to accept the contract as presented with the notations requested by the commissioner.
The draft contract as read during the meeting included a $1,000,000 per-occurrence and $2,000,000 aggregate liability threshold in the vendor insurance section but did not explicitly list the county as an additional insured; commissioners asked that the county be added and that property-damage limits be specified in writing rather than left to “substitute” language in the draft.
The board gave no further direction beyond asking staff to incorporate the listed clarifications and then approved the motion by unanimous vote.
Less critical background: the item was presented during the business session; the board approved the consent to negotiate and finalize the agreement with the requested clarifications. No other formal contingencies or external approvals were cited during the discussion.
