Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Appeals court hears dispute over when statute of limitations ran in Marks v. DeVries Education Group

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At oral argument in Marks v. DeVries Education Group, counsel disputed whether a 2017 letter or a later administrative process triggered the statute of limitations and whether a grievance process tolled the limitations period for claims including Chapter 93A and misrepresentation.

A three-justice Appeals Court panel heard argument over whether Michael Marks’ claims against Ross University and Auburn were time-barred, and whether an administrative grievance or a later final decision triggered the statute of limitations.

The panel, introduced by Justice Ariane Bueno, questioned whether a letter from Auburn in February 2017 telling Marks he could not finish the clinical program was the triggering event or whether the multi-year administrative process that culminated in 2021 controlled. “I think my brother argues that this issue is being…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans