Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Water Service Ownership topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Oakview residents press Lisle board to act on Illinois American Water service, trustees order legal review

3202025 · May 6, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Multiple Oakview residents urged the Village of Lisle to resolve longstanding water ownership, inspection and billing problems tied to Illinois American Water. Trustees and the mayor said the new village attorney and incoming village manager will review prior work, court precedent and next steps; no formal board action was taken.

Oakview residents urged the Village of Lisle on May 5 to pursue control of their water system from Illinois American Water and to address alleged unpermitted work and inspection lapses that they say have caused high bills and property damage.

The comments focused on claims that the village issued permits allowing Illinois American Water to install and cut water mains on privately owned property in Oakview, that final inspections were never completed and that residents — not the utility — bear high bills and repair costs. Susan Surreal, an Oakview resident, said the subdivision includes about 404 homes and estimated home repair costs at roughly $20,000 per property for damaged mains: "You allowed this damage by issuing the permits to do it," she told the board.

Why it matters: The Oakview dispute has persisted for decades and affects hundreds of households’ monthly bills and, residents say, public-safety and property-rights questions. Speakers asked the board to pursue ownership or other remedies that would lower rates or secure local control of water service.

Residents pressed several legal and factual claims. Ed Stanley, an Oakview resident and longtime activist, asked trustees to use an Illinois Supreme Court decision that he and others say supports transferring control of the Oakview system to the village. Former water commission member Dan Greco told the board he and two other former commission members stand ready to provide historical background and called suspected inspection gaps "concerning" if verified.

Trustees responded that the matter will be reviewed by the village’s newly appointed attorney and the incoming village manager. Trustee Duffy told residents the issue will be "looked at" and that the board is not going to let it "fall off our plate." Mayor Mary Jo Mullin asked for patience while staff and counsel gather facts and said the village will investigate ownership changes and other issues raised by residents.

Discussion vs. decision: The board did not take formal action or vote on Oakview water matters at the May 5 meeting. Instead, multiple trustees and the mayor described the topic as a priority for review and directed staff and the new village attorney to analyze prior task-force work, relevant court precedent and ownership questions. No timeline or formal assignment with a deadline was adopted on the record.

Claims and clarifications: Several numeric claims made by speakers are included as presented to the board: Susan Surreal said Oakview contains about 404 homes and estimated cumulative tax payments since 1958 at more than $25,000,000; she also said repair costs per affected home would average about $20,000. The board did not confirm those figures during the meeting.

Next steps and outlook: Trustees said the newly seated board, the returning village attorney and the incoming village manager will review documents, the cited Illinois Supreme Court material and prior task-force options. Residents said they will continue to attend meetings and may pursue deannexation if the village does not act. No litigation or acquisition action was declared at the meeting.

Ending: Oakview residents who testified said they expect the board to return with findings and options. Trustees asked for time to complete a legal and factual review and indicated they would report back to the board after staff and counsel have evaluated the case.