Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Storefront Signage topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
HDC advisory panel approves replacement sign for 16 Federal Street with lighting condition
Summary
The HDC Sign Advisory Committee voted to recommend approval of a like‑for‑like replacement projecting sign at 16 Federal Street, conditioning the approval on compliance with the committee's lighting guidelines (equivalent of 15 watts).
The HDC Sign Advisory Committee on May 6 recommended approval of a replacement projecting sign at 16 Federal Street, voting to approve the application as submitted while requiring the sign's lighting to meet the committee's wattage limits.
The sign applicant, Edwin (presenting for the business at 16 Federal Street), told the committee the proposal was a like‑for‑like replacement of a prior sign and that two tenant businesses would occupy the address. Chair Chris (chair) and commissioners discussed the multi‑tenant rules in the Sign Guidelines and reminded the applicants that a master sign plan would be required once multiple business signs were proposed for the same building.
Why it matters: The committee's decision sets a condition that limits lighting output for the installation; the panel noted its guidelines cap individual fixture output at a 15‑watt equivalent for sign illumination. Committee members also underscored that approval of this single sign will count toward the building's overall sign allotment and may affect later applications for additional tenant signage.
The committee's deliberations focused on tenant signage rules and lighting. Commissioner Kevin Kuester said he expected to see additional sign applications for other parts of the building and raised a question about the recommended fixture type. Edwin said the team proposed three small LED fixtures (about 7 watts each) to minimize profile and light output. Commissioner Ben Normans and Commissioner Paul Wolf expressed no objection to the sign itself and suggested the applicants file a master sign plan when additional tenant signs are ready.
The motion to approve as submitted, with the condition that the lighting meet the HDC guidelines, was adopted by roll call: Paul Wolf, Kevin Kuester and Ben Normans all voted in favor. Staff member Nicky Sheriff confirmed that any subsequent tenant signs will be reviewed under the multi‑tenant provisions in the guidelines.
The committee advised the applicants to submit the master sign plan when they file the follow‑on business‑specific signs so the panel can evaluate how multiple signs on the same building will work together.
