Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Variance Tabled Crowwing topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

PCBOA tables MJK Living Trust variance request for screened porch; applicant invited to amend application

3193241 · April 29, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board tabled a variance application by MJK Living Trust seeking a 10-foot side‑yard setback reduction to build a screened porch; commissioners asked the applicant to consider an alternative design that would place a screened porch on the existing lakeside deck and to return with an amended application and clearer justification.

Hubbard County PCBOA on April 1 tabled a variance application by MJK Living Trust that requested a reduction of the 10-foot side-lot-line setback to add a 12-by-12 screened porch on the north side of an existing house at Second Crow Wing Lake.

Applicant Matthew Kundert asked to add a screened porch on the house’s north side. Neighbors and the board discussed privacy, proximity to the adjacent property (the nearest living area on the neighboring lot is about 30 feet away), and alternatives such as enclosing a portion of the existing 12-by-38 lakeside deck rather than encroaching toward the side lot line.

During the hearing several commissioners expressed reservations about approving an elevated screened porch two feet from the side property line. Commissioners suggested the applicant either relocate the porch onto the existing lakeside deck or demonstrate in writing why a deck‑side porch would be impractical, including drawings and details about circulation, roof connections, access and stormwater. Several commissioners indicated they would be more receptive to an amended application showing the lakeside alternative.

The board voted to table the application to allow the applicant time to prepare an amended proposal. Larry moved to table and Tim seconded; the motion passed unanimously by voice vote. The board noted tabling is procedural and does not guarantee future approval; if the applicant amends the application the board will re‑notice the change and consider the revised plan at a subsequent meeting.