Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Comment Rules topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Public commenters press county over new citizen-participation rules; commissioners reiterate decorum standards
Summary
Multiple speakers during the public-comment period told commissioners they object to recent refinements to citizen-participation rules and school-board public-comment changes. Commissioners emphasized order and explained legal grounds for limited, viewpoint-neutral restrictions.
At Tuesday’s Washington County commissioners meeting, several members of the public used the citizens-participation period to challenge recently adopted rules governing public comment and to urge preservation of First Amendment protections.
A presiding official opened the session by reading the revised rules and explaining they are intended to be viewpoint-neutral and aimed at preserving order so meetings can proceed. The presiding official said federal courts permit limited speech restrictions in a government-controlled limited public forum when rules prevent disruptions and are applied without regard to viewpoint, and warned that excessive profanity or threatening conduct could be curtailed.
Several speakers responded. Curtis Ray of Hagerstown said the county’s rules risk abridging speech and questioned why a fellow community member had been barred from meetings despite using only his allotted three minutes. Dave Williams urged opposition to a proposed Washington County Board of Education change to Policy KD that would require public speakers to sign up 24 hours before a meeting, saying the change would “stifle public comment.” Jeremy Tindall (Bridal) urged commissioners to avoid escalating confrontation and noted a Maryland Office of the Attorney General opinion had warned against broadly banning attendees via trespass orders related to open-meetings rules.
Other public commenters raised local issues: Jill Katz said she was worried about traffic near a new Wawa and asked that the Traffic Advisory Committee address it; Austin LaRue said federal budget freezes could affect county funding; and Arthur LaRue said he expected unresolved First Amendment questions to be settled in court.
County staff answered specific procedural questions: the presiding official and staff reiterated that rules limit conduct, volume and repeated profanity to prevent disruptive behavior; they said the rules are not intended to restrict viewpoints. The county administrator later clarified that separate policy changes being considered by the Board of Education (Policy KD) and an independent Board of Zoning Appeals decision on a cell tower are not decisions the board could overturn.
No formal change to county citizen-participation policy was made at the meeting; the commissioners reiterated the rules and invited community feedback.
