Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Household Movers Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Bureau steps up enforcement on unpermitted movers; advisory warns pods, restoration and brokers may need permits
Summary
The bureau outlined enforcement activity against unpermitted household movers — 95 investigations since July, including 13 'hold-hostage' cases and 24 cease-and-desist letters — and posted an advisory clarifying that storage containers, restoration firms and brokers may require permits and are subject to tariff and valuation rules.
The Bureau of Household Goods and Services told its advisory council it has stepped up enforcement of unpermitted moving activity and issued an industry advisory to clarify which businesses must obtain household-mover permits.
The bureau reported that investigators worked 95 household-mover cases since July 1: 13 involved potential "hold-hostage" situations, 80 involved suspected unlicensed activity and the bureau issued 24 cease-and-desist letters to unpermitted movers. Of the 13 'hold-hostage' cases, staff said nine have been resolved, four remain pending, one is with a city or district attorney and one was referred to another agency.
The bureau posted Industry Advisory 19-03 to clarify scope and licensing requirements, telling restoration companies, brokers, interstate movers and storage-container firms ("pods") that moving household goods for compensation on public roads requires compliance with the Household Movers Act. The advisory noted Business and Professions Code section 19235 and said violations of the tariff and the act are enforcement grounds per section 19228.
Policy staff emphasized civil remedies for consumers: an unpermitted mover may not legally enforce a security interest to recover unpaid amounts, and consumers who used an unpermitted mover can sue to recover all money paid. The advisory and enforcement activity are intended to deter unlicensed operators and protect consumers.
Restoration-industry representatives in public comment asked the bureau for additional dialogue; a Servpro representative asked the bureau to consider a temporary stay for disaster-restoration companies while rulemaking proceeds.
