Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Nogales reviews preliminary FY2025–26 budget; water fund remains the sole unbalanced department

3190586 · April 24, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At a budget workshop, city staff presented the proposed FY2025–26 expenditures, noting reserve growth in the general fund and a $369,280 shortfall in the water enterprise fund. Council approved four routine items including a $120,000 budget transfer for library and city building fire suppression work and adopted new cemetery rules.

The Nogales City Council on Wednesday reviewed the proposed fiscal year 2025–26 budget at a study session, hearing that most departments’ proposed spending is balanced but the city’s water enterprise fund is projected to run a deficit. Staff also described several proposed staffing and capital changes and said grant activity will be centralized in the finance office.

Why it matters: The workshop showed the budget largely intact across general government departments while highlighting one clear funding risk — water utility revenues that staff said are too low to support current operations. Council also voted on four routine items at the end of the session, including a budget transfer for fire-suppression work and adoption of cemetery rules.

Finance director Mr. Kramer told the council that the city’s non-departmental reserves grew and that most departments are balanced: “Our reserve can grow every year, and it has grown a large amount this year.” He listed non-departmental expenditures for FY2026 at $17,684,760 and a projected reserve of $12,774,362 — an increase the director described as “very, very good.”

But Mr. Kramer warned that the water enterprise fund is the one account staff could not balance in the preliminary figures. According to staff figures presented at the session, the water fund is roughly $369,280 “in the negative” under current revenue assumptions. To reduce near-term pressure, staff asked council to consider postponing a previously…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans