Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Municipal Budget And Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Fountain Hills council narrows FY26 staff pay increase to 2.5% amid revenue uncertainty
Summary
Council gave staff direction to include a 2.5% cost‑of‑living adjustment in the FY26 budget and reiterated conservative revenue assumptions and contingency reliance as staff prepares the tentative budget for formal adoption.
Get email alerts on the Municipal Budget And Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Fountain Hills town staff presented a final budget workshop preview of the FY26 draft budget and council settled on a 2.5% cost‑of‑living adjustment (COLA) for staff as the working direction for the tentative budget.
Finance Director Paul told the council the town’s proposed budget totals about $50,370,000 across all funds, with a general fund revenue projection of $26,050,000. The town holds contingency of roughly $1,230,000 in the general fund, which staff described as the primary buffer if revenues come in below projections.
Staff noted conservative revenue practices — using a 95% confidence level for projections — and recent local sales tax flattening that required a $250,000 reduction in earlier sales tax estimates. Paul said adjustments to pay recommendations will reduce contingency dollar‑for‑dollar; for example, a $300,000 increase in pay authority would reduce contingency by the same amount.
Council discussed a basket of compensation indicators (inflation, public‑sector indices, private‑sector pay, Social Security COLA and a local survey). After floor discussion, four council members supported 2.5% and others preferred slightly higher numbers; the working direction was 2.5% for inclusion in the proposed budget. Staff said each 1% of COLA costs about $107,000 to the town budget and that the town’s estimate of a 2.5% COLA adds roughly $270,000 to the FY26 budget.
Other budget highlights discussed by staff: - Expenditure limitation: Paul said the town’s expenditure limitation is $36,580,000 and the proposed budget authority is $50,370,000; staff explained the difference is covered by allowable exclusions (grants, HEERF, investment earnings and other exclusions) and use of prior‑year one‑time exclusions carried forward. - Special and capital funds: Palomino reconstruction and other capital projects drive most of the year‑over‑year increase; $5.4 million of the Palomino project is expected to be funded from the streets fund, while other CIP spending includes anticipated grant reimbursements and development impact fees. - Facility and vehicle reserves: staff proposed increasing the facilities reserve budget and noted the town has about $2.7 million in the vehicle replacement fund and is budgeting $390,000 to replace an older brush truck.
What’s next: staff will publish the tentative budget and return to council at the regular meeting on May 6 for tentative adoption; the final budget and public hearing are scheduled for June 3. Any changes to the tentative budget between May 6 and final adoption will generally be reductions unless otherwise directed at public meetings.

