A draft sick‑leave buyback policy was presented May 2 as a county proposal to reward employees who maintain a large sick‑leave balance and have consistent attendance.

"This is a proposed policy to reward employees that accrue and maintain an adequate balance of sick leave for future needs," Jeff told the fiscal court, noting the wellness committee recommended the idea. Under the draft, employees who accrue and maintain 60 days of sick leave could sell back up to three days each year by submitting a November request for December payment. Payments would be processed through payroll and subject to taxes and benefit calculations.

Staff said 38 employees currently meet the 60‑day threshold. Estimated payment per participating employee was roughly $650; total annual cost if every eligible employee sold the three days would be about $25,000, and a more likely annual cost estimate is about $15,000. Jeff explained the 60‑day threshold aligns with the 12‑week FMLA (Family and Medical Leave Act) allotment so that employees would keep sufficient leave for serious absences.

Court members raised alternatives, including lowering the threshold to 40 or 45 days to broaden eligibility or allowing a different buyback structure (for example, selling five days). Staff agreed to model scenarios and return with cost estimates. The court did not approve a policy on May 2 but directed staff to provide additional analyses on reduced thresholds and fiscal impacts.