Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tile Drainage topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Researchers say tile drainage helps farm productivity, raises water‑quality questions
Summary
UVM researchers and extension staff told the committee that tile drainage has become more common as Vermont gets wetter, boosts yields and enables conservation practices but can mobilize phosphorus; experimental field filters and an on‑farm paired watershed study are underway to measure net water‑quality effects.
Researchers and extension staff told the Agriculture, Food Resiliency & Forestry Committee that tile drainage is being adopted by Vermont farms to manage wetter conditions, improve yields and enable conservation practices, while raising questions about phosphorus transport and mitigation.
Joshua (researcher) described rising precipitation trends and said farmers focused on tile drainage after wetter conditions intensified following Tropical Storm Irene. He explained how modern tile — corrugated plastic pipe installed beneath the root zone — lowers water tables, improves trafficability and generally increases yields and consistency. “Tile drainage tends to reduce the peak flows of water from a field,” Joshua said, describing literature showing a dampened hydrograph and a modest increase (10–20%) in annual water leaving a drained field.
Heather Darby, part of the UVM team and a farmer, summarized survey and experimental results: a statewide survey covered roughly 60,000 acres and found about 15,000 acres tiled among respondents; farmers reported improved yields, fewer crop failures and better timing for field operations after installing tile. Darby described Discovery Farms Vermont, a paired‑watershed, on‑farm study in St. Albans Bay that compares tiled versus untiled plots with and without best management practices (no‑till, manure injection, cover crops and soil analytics).
Key data presented: tile outlets monitored in the Champlain Valley measured total phosphorus losses in a typical range of 0.7 to 1.12 pounds per acre per year, aligning with published U.S. ranges of about 0.35–1.4 lb/acre/yr. Experimental edge‑of‑field filters using pea gravel and iron shavings removed about 80% of total phosphorus mass and about 95% of soluble reactive phosphorus in the trials Heather described. At Discovery Farms, Darby reported yield differences in an early comparison: tiled BMP plots produced about 21 tons per acre while non‑tiled plots produced about 10.8 tons per acre; tiled plots also showed higher cover crop biomass and greater soil nitrate retained ahead of sidedress, reducing additional nitrogen needs (reported example: 65 lb N needed on tiled vs. 105 lb N on untiled in a row).
Researchers emphasized complexity: tile can reduce surface runoff and erosion and enable cover crops and no‑till, which tend to reduce particulate phosphorus loss; but in heavy clay soils with preferential flow, rapid transport through cracks can carry dissolved phosphorus to tile lines. Joshua cited studies from the Western Lake Erie Basin that raised this concern and described Vermont monitoring results that fall within U.S. ranges.
Researchers said mitigation options show promise: the team’s experimental filters captured substantial phosphorus mass in field trials, and the multi‑year Discovery Farms Vermont project aims to quantify net field‑level water‑quality outcomes. Heather noted the research is in early years and called for continued monitoring and funding to assess tradeoffs.
Separate comment on community impacts: Darby, who also farms, discussed how neighbor conflicts over odors and manure spreading affect farmer well‑being and urged attention to “right to farm” protections; she said such rules are important for farm viability and local food security.
Ending: Committee members asked technical questions on soil types, hydrology, and greenhouse gas emissions; researchers said more data are forthcoming from ongoing trials and monitoring.
