Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Short Term Rentals topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Advisory committee backs zoning clarification for short‑term rentals, opposes discriminatory measures
Summary
The Advisory Committee of Nonvoting Taxpayers of Nantucket voted May 1 to support Article 66 (a zoning clarification allowing rentals subject to existing bylaws) and to oppose Articles 67, 68 and 69, which the committee said discriminate against nonvoting taxpayers and risk further litigation.
Get email alerts on the Short Term Rentals topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Nantucket — On May 1, 2025, the Advisory Committee of Nonvoting Taxpayers of Nantucket voted to support Article 66, a zoning article intended to clarify that renting property (short‑ or long‑term) is permitted where existing bylaw restrictions are followed, and to oppose Articles 67, 68 and 69, which the committee said would create unequal treatment.
Committee members said the primary goal of supporting Article 66 is to resolve years of uncertainty and ongoing litigation by making clear in the zoning code what current bylaws already regulate. Committee members noted that several lawsuits over rental rights have been filed against nonvoting taxpayers and that a judge has asked the town for clearer zoning direction.
The committee concluded that Article 66 would put zoning clarity “to bed” and reduce future legal disputes if voters approve it, while Articles 67 and 68 would introduce discriminatory limits against some property owners. After discussion, the committee moved and seconded a motion to support Article 66 and to oppose Articles 67, 68 and 69. The motion was approved unanimously among those voting.
Why it matters: Committee members said clarity in zoning would reduce litigation costs for the town and remove uncertainty for homeowners who rely on occasional rental income to maintain their properties. The committee also noted short‑term rental regulation is governed today by Section 123 of the town’s general bylaws and that Article 66 would explicitly tie zoning to those bylaws.
Public comment during the meeting echoed the committee’s view that access to rental income is essential for many longtime property owners. Members of the public who spoke described years of renting their homes as part of a viable path to continued ownership and urged the committee’s position.
What the committee directed: The committee authorized a concise statement for Kathy Baird, the committee’s designated representative at Town Meeting, to deliver on Article 66 and to reference the committee’s opposition to Articles 67, 68 and 69 when those items arise.
Background: Article 66 is a zoning article requiring a two‑thirds majority if it appears on the zoning warrant; Articles 67–69 would amend other rules and, according to committee members, contain provisions that would differentially affect owners who do not hold town voting rights.
Next steps: Kathy Baird will have discretion to speak at Town Meeting and reference the committee’s prior statement when the related articles are called.

