Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Residential Deck Variance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Amity Harbor homeowner seeks variances for two-level deck, board keeps record open

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

James Stout represented Christina Sabo seeking variances to build a two-level deck in Amity Harbor. The lot is smaller than the C-zone minimum and the applicant requested relief for rear-yard setback, side-yard aggregate and building coverage. The board asked for revised plans and Suffolk County review; hearing closed and decision reserved.

James J. Stout represented Christina Sabo before the Town of Babylon Zoning Board of Appeals to request variances for a two-level rear deck at a property in Amity Harbor.

Stout said the property is zoned C, which requires a minimum lot size of 6,000 square feet and 60 feet width; the subject lot is about 4,000 square feet and 40 feet wide. He described requested relief including a rear-yard setback of 6 feet where 30 feet is required, side-yard aggregate relief (existing side yards of 4.8 and 12.5 feet yielding a 17.3-foot aggregate versus the 25-foot requirement), and building-area relief (proposed coverage approximately 42.55% vs. 30% allowed). Stout explained the lower deck portion will be 4 feet 10 inches above adjacent grade and that the upper portion serves as a small platform to exit the main level from an elevated house in a flood zone.

Board member Delavecchia asked whether the deck could be cut back to a 10-foot setback; Stout said his client would "entertain that" and agreed revised plans would be needed if the board sought a smaller encroachment. The board also advised that hot tubs must maintain a 6-foot setback from rear and side property lines and that the deck must remain open beneath because of flood-zone elevation requirements.

Stout submitted two neighbor endorsement letters and argued that the requested relief was driven by the lot’s constrained dimensions and flood-elevation requirements. The board said Suffolk County planning comments were outstanding and asked for a new set of plans showing the requested revisions; the hearing was closed and decision reserved with the record left open for Suffolk County review and revised plans.

Why it matters: the applicant is seeking multiple variances tied to lot size and flood-zone elevation; the board’s request for revised plans and county review will shape whether and how the deck is modified to reduce impacts on neighbors.