Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Behavioral Supports topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Olathe proposes district-run K–8 alternative program for students with intensive behavioral and social-emotional needs

3177177 · May 2, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

District leaders presented a planned short-term, solution-oriented K–8 alternative program aimed at students with extreme behavioral or social-emotional needs; board members heard details on eligibility, a proposed 45–60 day intervention window and plans to launch in 2026–27.

District administrators presented a high-level plan for a new K–8 alternative program designed to serve students with significant behavioral or social-emotional needs that have not responded to school-level interventions.

Dr. Jill Smith and Dr. Liz Harrison (presenters identified in the meeting) described the program as a short-term, individualized intervention intended to minimize disruption to a student’s education while supporting a return to the home school. The district emphasized that the program will be available to both general-education and special-education students and that placement would be decided collaboratively by a district review team, the student’s school team and alternative-program leaders.

Presenters said the program is intended as a 45–60 day intervention in many cases but that the district does not intend to rigidly limit placements to that timeframe. "Some students may be ready to transition earlier; others may need a longer stay," a presenter said during questions, and the district said outcomes from visited programs elsewhere informed a flexible approach.

District officials said they reviewed a range of existing programs across the country—public, private, therapeutic and boarding schools—and worked with external research partners (EAB) to assemble best practices. The proposal lists eight program goals: personalized support, collaborative care, smooth transitions in and out of the program, whole-child wellness, confidence, executive-functioning skill building, social-emotional growth and life skills.

Officials outlined an example case: a student with ongoing extreme outbursts whose school team submits documentation for review, who then would join a 45–60 day intervention in the alternative program while staff work with the family and the home school on supports and a transition plan. The program’s aim, officials said, is to improve student well-being, reduce classroom disruption and build district capacity to support students in their home schools.

Board members asked about research scope, parent resources and the evidence for a 45–60 day model. Presenters said the district visited programs in Georgia, Texas and other areas and looked at a variety of settings; they also said they are inventorying county and community resources for families and exploring parent supports. A district official said one visited program used a 45-day model, but the district intends an individualized approach rather than a fixed duration.

Administrators said the target launch is the 2026–27 school year and that further community briefings and board updates will follow. The board and superintendent described the program as responsive to concerns heard in recent district listening sessions about student behavior and staff strain in classrooms.