Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Open Meetings topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Kingman deputy city attorney gives annual open-meeting-law refresher
Summary
Deputy City Attorney Amy Shriver reviewed Arizona open-meeting rules, quorum requirements, conflict-of-interest guidance and basic parliamentary procedure at the Clean City Commission meeting on April 17.
Amy Shriver, deputy city attorney for the City of Kingman, delivered the commission's annual open-meeting-law and parliamentary-procedure training at the Clean City Commission meeting on April 17.
The training explained the purpose and basic requirements of Arizona's open-meeting rules, saying this is “just an annual open meeting law training” offered as a refresher for commissioners. Shriver told the commission that a public body includes “the legislature, all boards and commissions,” and that meetings — whether in person or via technology — generally must be open to the public.
Why it matters: Open-meeting law preserves public access and trust in local government, Shriver said. She emphasized the 24-hour notice minimum for meetings and the need for agendas that identify the specific matters to be considered, and she warned that actions taken on items not properly noticed are “null and void.”
Shriver cautioned that gatherings through email, social media, or text can create an unintentional quorum and thus constitute a meeting if a majority participates and business is discussed. She described “splintering the quorum” with an illustrative example of informal one-on-one conversations that eventually amount to a majority agreeing on an item.
The deputy city attorney described options available when members of the public speak during a call to the public: remain silent, ask staff to review the matter, request it be placed on a future agenda, or briefly and directly respond to criticism. She noted calls to the public are not required by statute and that the commission may impose reasonable time limits.
On sanctions and enforcement, Shriver said the Arizona Attorney General’s office focuses on education but can investigate complaints; remedies range from corrective education to civil penalties. She also covered conflicts of interest, including the statutory concept of a remote interest that may allow participation when the official’s interest is not greater than that of at least nine other similarly situated persons.
Shriver closed with an overview of basic parliamentary procedure — how to obtain the floor, move and second a motion, and the chair’s role in stating motions — urging commissioners to use the rules to allow orderly debate and clear votes.
The training was presented at the start of the meeting and included a short Q&A with commissioners about specific conflict-of-interest and agenda questions.
