Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Ordinance Updates topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Glynn County updates zoning and code references to reflect planning and zoning reorganization
Summary
The Glynn County Board of Commissioners on May 1 approved county-initiated text amendments renaming references from 'community development director/department' to 'planning and zoning director/department' and corrected ordinance cross-references after a 2023 reorganization that relocated engineering and licensing functions.
At its May 1 meeting the Glynn County Board of Commissioners approved county-initiated amendments to the county zoning ordinance, subdivision regulations and the Glynn County Code of Ordinances to reflect an organizational change: references that formerly named the community development director and department were replaced with planning and zoning director and department where applicable, and ordinance references were corrected to reflect engineering and licensing realignments.
John Johnson, who identified himself as interim community development director, presented the zoning- and subdivision-related text amendment (TA-24-1). Johnson told commissioners the change would streamline approval flow by making the planning and zoning director the signee for certain approvals rather than routing multiple layers of review to higher-level signatories. "This would actually speed up the process...from a timing standpoint, I could see some improvement in time," Johnson said.
Mister Gentry presented a companion ordinance amendment to the county code. He said a 2023 reorganization moved licensing and compliance functions under finance and established engineering services as a standalone department; some ordinance references had not been updated at that time. The county attorney reviewed and adjusted the ordinance language to assign review and approval responsibilities to the appropriate officers — for example the county engineer or the licensing and compliance director — where the code had previously referenced the community development director.
The public hearings on both items drew no speakers. A commissioner moved to approve TA-24-1; another moved to adopt the ordinance amendments as presented. Both motions were seconded and approved with no recorded opposition.
County staff said the amendments align the code with the current organizational structure and should streamline permit and licensing workflows; no implementation timeline or budgetary impacts were disclosed at the meeting.
