Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Early Childhood Education topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate Government Operations Committee votes 4-1 to advance early childhood education bill with amendment
Summary
The Vermont Senate Government Operations Committee voted 4-1 on May 1 to report H.472, an early childhood education measure, favorably to the Senate with an amendment; committee members raised concerns that an "ECE 3" classification could duplicate the Agency of Education license and the bill may require review by money committees.
Get email alerts on the Early Childhood Education topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Vermont Senate Government Operations Committee voted 4-1 on May 1 to report H.472, an early childhood education bill, favorably to the full Senate with an amendment and send it back to the House for concurrence and possible referral to money committees.
Committee members said the amendment (dated April 29) leaves the measure in substantially the same form they reviewed, but several members raised concerns about a proposed "ECE 3" classification. A committee member described ECE 3 as potentially duplicative of the Agency of Education's early childhood educator license and said that duplication was a primary reason for hesitation among some members.
The committee roll call on the motion to report H.472 was: Senator Clarkson, yes; Senator Hart, yes; Senator Dihovsky, no; Senator Waite, yes; and Senator Collum, yes. The committee clerk announced the measure passed out of committee with a 4-1-0 favorable vote. The committee also noted that the bill contains funding and that those budget provisions may require review by one or more money committees before final action.
During discussion, members and staff said they had received comments from the Agency of Education (AOE) signaling implementation concerns and from outside stakeholders raising the possibility of confusion between the bill's new classifications and existing AOE credentials. A committee member said a family child-care operator consulted by a member had practical questions about how the ECE 3 requirements would apply to operating multiple day-care sites. Zoe Saunders was reported to have expressed concern about potential confusion during outreach, according to committee remarks.
No statutes or regulatory citations were read into the record during the committee's discussion; members focused on the bill language and on coordination with the Agency of Education. The committee's favorable report includes the amendment that was on the motion; committee members said they will monitor implementation and return to adjust the bill if necessary during a subsequent session if problems emerge.
The committee did not adopt additional amendments at the May 1 meeting. The chair and members said they expected the bill to move forward to the Senate floor and that further work on funding details could follow in the money committees.
The committee meeting record shows the item was discussed toward the end of the May 1 agenda and that members spent the bulk of the remaining time addressing H.472 and related scheduling. No formal timetable for House concurrence or floor action was announced at the meeting.

