Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Governance Board Norms topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Provo School Board reviews meeting norms and 'destructive behaviors' guidance
Summary
At its April 29 study session the Provo City School Board reviewed internal board norms from its handbook and guidance from the USDA 'Guide to Effective School Boards,' emphasizing civil discourse, avoiding staff direction and discouraging personal attacks.
The Provo City School Board opened its April 29 study session with a review of board norms and conduct expectations drawn from the district handbook and the USDA’s Guide to Effective School Boards.
Board vice president Gina Hales led the training segment, telling members the norms “are kind of mirror mirror images” of desired behaviors and that the handbook is the source for the guidance. Hales emphasized focus on student learning, civil discourse and upholding final board decisions even when members disagree.
Hales told the board: “We are never to direct staff. That is, that is Devin and Wendy’s job, not our job.” The presentation also highlighted specific behaviors to avoid, citing the USDA guide: personal attacks, dominance of discussion, lack of preparation and micromanaging staff.
Nut graf: The short training served as an internal reminder of board roles and limits of authority, reiterated expectations for civility and reminded members not to substitute governance for staff operational responsibilities.
Key points
- Source: Board vice president said norms derive from the district handbook; the session also referenced the USDA Guide to Effective School Boards as a source of recommended ‘‘destructive behaviors to avoid.’’
- Roles: Members were reminded to support final board decisions in public even if they were in the minority, and to avoid directing staff about operational matters.
- Conduct: The guidance stressed civil discourse, respect for roles and responsibilities, and the importance of resolving disputes respectfully rather than escalating conflict.
Ending: The norms review concluded before the meeting moved to a detailed update on the Wasatch Elementary retaining wall. No formal action or vote was taken on the norms during this study session.
