Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Coast Guard Recapitalization topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

House Transportation Committee approves roughly $22 billion for Coast Guard recapitalization in reconciliation package

3161937 · May 1, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee approved a reconciliation committee print that includes nearly $22 billion to recapitalize Coast Guard fleets and shore infrastructure.

The House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee on a party-line markup approved a committee print that includes nearly $22 billion to recapitalize U.S. Coast Guard assets, including new cutters, aircraft and icebreakers and construction of the shore-side facilities needed to support them.

Chairman Sam Graves, offering an amendment in the nature of a substitute that the committee adopted as the base text, said the measure ‘‘will provide nearly $22,000,000,000 to recapitalize Coast Guard assets, including the acquisition of cutters, aircraft, icebreakers, while also funding the construction of the facilities needed to support these new assets.’’

Why it matters: Committee members said recapitalizing the service is long overdue as cutters, aircraft and shore infrastructure have aged and mission demands have grown. Members who supported the funding described it as a multi-year start on fleet and facility modernization; those skeptical pressed for stronger procurement oversight and assurances that the service’s health care, housing and personnel needs would be funded alongside equipment purchases.

Details and debate: Supporters described the funding as a historic investment into maritime security and naval shipbuilding capacity. Representative Ezell said the package ‘‘represents the largest investment in the Coast Guard’s ... history’’ and called the projects ‘‘badly needed investments.’’ Other members, including Representative Larson, said they supported the concept but warned the reconciliation process was partisan and stressed that some domestic priorities elsewhere in the bill were cut to offset these and other investments.

Committee action: The committee adopted the chairman’s amendment in the nature of a substitute and later approved the committee print as amended by recorded vote. The final committee action to transmit the package to the House Budget Committee passed, 36–30, according to the committee's recorded vote.

What’s next: The committee’s version will be transmitted to the House Budget Committee for inclusion in reconciliation. Several members said oversight provisions should accompany significant procurement and shipbuilding investments and asked for follow‑up reporting and accountability measures.

Ending: The committee adopted the title containing the Coast Guard funding while several members said they would press for additional oversight or additional personnel- and housing‑related investments in later measures. The package as a whole will move into the larger reconciliation path in the House.