Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Development Agreement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Pembroke Park delays ECOS development agreement after commissioners seek clarity on charging stations and fees
Summary
Commissioners discussed the ECOS residential development agreement, including six electric vehicle charging stations, a one-time $200,000 municipal contribution and how impact and sewer connection fees will be handled; the item was moved from workshop discussion to a line-item for the May 14 meeting for further clarification.
Town of Pembroke Park commissioners discussed a proposed development agreement for the ECOS residential project, asking staff and the developer to clarify where a one-time $200,000 municipal contribution would be used and how local impact and sewer connection fees will be handled.
The commission asked the town manager and attorney to confirm that the agreement now includes the elements previously requested by the commission, including installation of six electric vehicle charging stations at the site. Town Manager David Lynch told the commission the charging-station requirement and other changes had been incorporated into the draft agreement and that staff hoped for approval, but he deferred legal detail to the town attorney.
Commissioners pressed for clarity about the $200,000 line item: whether it replaces recurring impact or sewer connection revenue or is a separate, one-time municipal contribution. Commissioner Jacobs said she was concerned that the town would lose recurring sewer revenue—she mentioned an item in a different project that resulted in an estimated $185,000 annual shortfall when a development tied into county sewer service instead of the town’s system. Attorney Keith Poliakoff (representing the developer at prior meetings) and staff confirmed impact fees remain required by code and are separately contemplated from the $200,000 contribution.
The commission did not vote on the agreement during the workshop discussion. Staff and the attorney said the ECOS agreement would be placed on the regular meeting agenda as a line item for the May 14 meeting so that outstanding questions—impact fees, the intended use of the $200,000 contribution and confirmation of required utilities and project conditions—can be resolved before formal action.
Discussion points recorded at the workshop included: why the project would tie into county sewer rather than town sewer for this site, the role of the $200,000 contribution and whether it had been intended for a park project, and confirmation that impact fees remain separately required by code.
The commission directed staff to return the agreement to the May 14 agenda as a line item with clearer financial and code-related clarifications so commissioners can consider approval at that meeting.
