Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Setback topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board OKs reduced front setback for Johnsons' garage addition with timeline condition
Summary
David and Mary Kate Johnson received special exception 25-03 to build an attached garage no closer than 19 feet from the front property line where 30 feet is required; the board conditioned the approval on work beginning within six months and finishing within nine months.
Get email alerts on the Zoning Setback topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Jackson County Board of Adjustment on April 28 approved special exception 25-03 to allow David and Mary Kate Johnson to build an attached garage with a front setback no closer than 19 feet, where the R‑1 zoning requires a 30-foot front setback.
David Johnson, the applicant, told the board he plans an attached garage about 24 by 24 feet (he said the finished width might end up closer to 20 feet) and that the requested 19-foot measurement accounts for possible roof overhang. He said a large tree near the front of the house constrains placement and that he expects contractor availability to begin in late July or August with completion within two to three months; the board’s ultimately-adopted condition set a completion deadline nine months from the approval date.
The board confirmed the applicant located and reviewed property markers and a survey, and staff said notified neighbors within the county’s 500-foot radius standard; no objection letters were reported. Staff and the board discussed utilities, a gas line that could require temporary rerouting by the supplier, and septic and water, all of which the applicant said would not be impacted.
Outcome and conditions: The motion to grant special exception 25-03 passed; the board conditioned approval on construction starting within six months and completing within nine months from the date of approval. The board recorded the action by voice vote; no roll-call tally is in the meeting record.
Speakers
- Mike Nicholson — Board of Adjustment member (government) - Daryl Devore — Board of Adjustment member (government) - John Arns — Board of Adjustment member (government) - Pete Fish — Board of Adjustment member (government) - David Johnson — applicant/homeowner (citizen) - Laurie (staff member) — county planning/zoning staff (government)
Authorities
- Jackson County zoning ordinance (front setback requirement: 30 feet) - Special exception case 25-03
Actions
- Motion: Grant special exception 25-03 to allow a front setback of no closer than 19 feet for an attached garage; condition that work start within 6 months and be completed within 9 months from the approval date. - Mover/Second: not specified in transcript; voice vote recorded. - Outcome: approved.
Discussion and distinctions: The hearing record separates discussion (survey, utility relocation, neighbors contacted) from the final decision (conditioned approval). The applicant said the project would “probably be done within 2 to 3 months” if contractors start in late July or early August; the board’s condition provides a longer window to accommodate permitting and scheduling.
Clarifying details
- Requested front setback: no closer than 19 feet (applicant requested a cushion for overhang). - Required front setback (R‑1 zoning): 30 feet. - Conditions: start in 6 months; complete in 9 months. - Utility note: applicant discussed temporary rerouting of a gas line by the supplier and said the temporary work would be limited to his property.
Proper names
- Jackson County - Leisure Lake (referenced in notice procedure)
Provenance
- Topic intro excerpt: "After the answer, David and Mary Kate Johnson. Okay. The proposal is, David and Mary Kate Johnson be granted special exception number 25Dash03, requesting a reduction in the required front setback." (transcript block at ~483.06) - Topic finish excerpt: "All opposed, same same. Right. Okay. Thank you. Thank you." (transcript block at ~1203.54 indicating the vote concluded)
Salience and context: Local zoning decision with direct effect on the applicants and immediate neighbors. The board’s timeline conditions shift responsibility to the applicant to meet the approved schedule and to staff for permitting and inspection follow‑up.

