Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Transportation Fleet topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee hears activity‑bus capital request: district seeks replacement of eight buses

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Transportation staff outlined a capital request to replace eight activity buses in a 35‑vehicle fleet, explained replacement criteria (20 years / 250,000 miles standard), noted varying mileage and engine issues, and discussed utilization and cost concerns.

Union County Public Schools’ transportation staff briefed the committee on a capital request to replace eight activity buses, describing fleet age, utilization patterns and rising replacement costs; the presentation was informational and no committee action was taken.

Colin Moore introduced the capital request and asked Transportation Director Joyner (identified as transportation director in the transcript) to explain replacement criteria. Joyner said state guidelines for replacing yellow school buses are “20 years or, 250,000 miles.” He added that activity buses often age out before reaching mileage thresholds and that the eight buses identified for replacement are roughly 20–21 years old.

Joyner said the district’s activity bus fleet is about 35 vehicles and that the eight identified buses include some with low odometer readings (examples given ranged from about 20,000 miles to 99,000 miles) and at least one lift bus with lower utilization. He noted the highest maintenance costs were tied to three buses with high oil consumption and that one has previously received a used engine swap. Some older units lack air conditioning and show rust, and five of the eight were purchased used by a previous director and may require more maintenance and state inspections.

Committee members asked whether the fleet could be reduced, given low mileage on many older buses; Joyner recommended against a one‑for‑one reduction because athletic scheduling and middle‑/high‑school needs can require multiple buses at short notice. He also described attempts to manage utilization by asking schools to use older buses for closer trips and by shifting buses between schools during summer months. A board member suggested clustering buses rather than assigning them to individual schools; Joyner said the district had tried centralized assignment previously but moved buses to schools to streamline scheduling for athletic directors.

Cost context: Joyner said current new‑bus pricing is roughly $140,000–$145,000 per vehicle (a lift‑equipped bus costs about $10,000 more) and that prices have risen sharply in recent years. He said that maintenance and parts costs for older buses — and the specialized nature of some engines in the older fleet — are drivers for replacement.

This item was informational; staff will take the capital request to the full board for consideration of funding in the capital plan.