Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Student Health Policies topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board postpones rewrite of head-lice policy after members seek clearer readmission language
Summary
Rutherford County board members discussed aligning policy 6.4031 (pediculosis/head lice) with CDC and state guidance and postponed the item so staff can reword readmission and treatment expectations; some members expressed concern about an ongoing case involving students who ride the bus.
Get email alerts on the Student Health Policies topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Rutherford County Board of Education members reviewed proposed updates to policy 6.4031, commonly described as the head-lice policy, discussed medical guidance that underpins current practice and voted to postpone the item to allow staff to rewrite unclear readmission language.
Staff and board members said the district's current administrative practice follows CDC and American Academy of Pediatrics guidance that head lice are not a public-health threat and students generally should not be excluded. “It's just based on recommendations from the CDC and the American Academy of Pediatrics,” a school nurse/administrator said, explaining why exclusion changed about a decade ago.
Board members raised a specific, ongoing case in which students with chronic infestations ride the school bus and other families and staff were concerned. One board member said social work and the Department of Children’s Services had been contacted, but she said the family had not taken corrective action. That member urged clearer policy language so the district would not leave the issue “open ended.”
Staff explained the draft still included readmission language that implied exclusion and said they would reword the policy to reflect current practice: schools will notify parents, provide treatment instructions and expect follow-up evidence of treatment, while exclusion would remain rare. Board members moved and seconded a postponement to allow staff to revise the language, and the motion passed on voice vote. The board directed staff to clarify timelines and criteria for readmission in the rewritten policy.

