Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Works Bids topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Hamilton County opens bids for Branch 154 bridge rehabilitation and First Street resurface; staff to send recommendations to highway committee

3155375 · April 30, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Multiple bids were opened for the Branch 154 bridge rehabilitation (120 Sixth Street over Cook Creek) and for Resurface Project 25-01280 First Street; staff will forward proposals to the county highway meeting for recommendation on Friday.

Hamilton County staff opened and read bids April 28 for two highway projects: Branch 154 rehabilitation at 120 Sixth Street (over Cook Creek) and the First Street resurface project (State Road 213 to State Road 37).

Connor (county staff reading bids) listed proposals for the Branch 154 rehabilitation from multiple contractors. The recorded proposals for Branch 154 included bids of $3,317,234.51 from BD Construction; $2,875,864.61 from Duncan Robertson; $2,969,000 from E & B Paving; $2,455,640 from HIS Constructors Inc.; $2,975,000 from Milestone Contractors LP; and $2,946,787 from Superior. Staff asked the board to forward all proposals to the highway committee for review and recommendation at its Friday meeting; commissioners voted to do so.

For Resurface Project 25‑01280 (First Street, State Road 213 to State Road 37), staff read bids including $1,681,969.69 from Midwest Paving; $1,751,756.54 from DC Construction Services; $1,615,690.01 from E & B Paving LLC; $1,830,556.90 from Assured Partners (representing Howard Asphalt per staff note); $1,820,720 from Baumgartner & Company Asphalt Services; and $1,531,000 from Rethrally. Staff similarly moved those proposals to the highway committee for recommendation, which the commissioners approved by voice vote.

No formal award or selection was made at the April 28 meeting; the board directed staff to deliver complete bid packages to the highway meeting for recommendation and to the auditor's office as required.